Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Teague v. Kentucky State Police et al
as 4:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Sarah Teague
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police, Henderson Police Department, Clay Hutchisosn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 4:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joseph S. Walker
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Mr. Clark, Mr. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 4:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
George Kevin Quinn
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, FBI, KSP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jaynard Quontell Owens
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center, David Osborne and Bill Billings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pappas v. Osborne et al
as 4:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pappas
Defendant:
David Osborne, LaDonna Thompson, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Thompson et al
as 4:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
Frankie Dwight Parker
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, David Osborne and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nutter v. Thomson et al
as 4:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gregory Nutter
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, David Osborne, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv00341
Plaintiff:
James David Osborne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rummage v. Virginia et al
as 4:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Gene Rummage, Sr.
Defendant:
Virginia , Southern Health Providers and David Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattingly v. Osborne et al
as 4:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
Steven Brad Mattingly
Defendant:
David Osborne, Southern Health Partners, Virginia Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
