Cases 21 - 30 of 44
SAMPSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv13670
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DAVID SAMPSON and LISA SAMPSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Hunter v. Kara Kalwinder, et al
as 17-15225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KARA KALWINDER, California Health Care Facility and BAXTER, California Health Care Facility
David Hunter v. Sacramento Superior Court, et al
as 16-16690
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Respondent - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Hunter v. Sacramento Superior Court et al
as 2:2016cv01505
Petitioner:
David Sampson Hunter
Respondent:
Sacramento Superior Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter v. Kalwinder et al
as 2:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
David Sampson Hunter
Defendant:
Kara Kalwinder and W. Baxter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Kalwinder et al
as 5:2016cv01844
Plaintiff:
David Sampson Hunter
Defendant:
Kara Kalwinder and W. Baxter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Lopez, et al.
as 2:2016cv00483
Petitioner:
David Sampson Hunter
Respondent:
M. Kroenlein, J. Stigelmayer, Haghbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Lopez
as 5:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
David Sampson Hunter
Defendant:
M. Kroenlein, J. Stigelmayer, Haghbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Paetzold
as 5:2014cv03232
Petitioner:
David Sampson Hunter
Respondent:
Raymond M. Paetzold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter v. Paetzold
as 5:2014cv03233
Plaintiff:
David Sampson Hunter
Defendant:
Raymond M. Paetzold and Santa Rosa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
