Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Robinson v. Neil
as 1:2017cv00652
Plaintiff:
Samuel Robinson , Markalo Harris , Eric Buig and others
Defendant:
Jim Neil and Gregory Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 4:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward DeMarco
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DeMarco v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 4:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward DeMarco
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. v. Bernstein Liebhard LLP et al
as 1:2015mc00005
Plaintiff:
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
Defendant:
Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Markovits Stock & DeMarco
Movant:
Markovits Stock & DeMarco
DeMarco v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2015dp20020
Plaintiff:
Louis DeMarco
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comer et al v. DirectTV, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01986
Plaintiff:
Charles Comer , Gregory Evans , Paul Groninger and others
Defendant:
DirectTV, Inc., DirectTV, LLC, DIRECTSAT USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
New York Life Insurance Company v. DeMarco et al
as 4:2013cv02267
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Susanna DeMarco, Todd DeMarco and Tammy DeMarco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Miller v. Coakley
as 4:2013cv02133
Petitioner:
DeMarco Detray Miller
Respondent:
Warden Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Platt et al v. Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Ohio Supreme Court et al
as 1:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Platt , Platt for Judge Campaign Committee and Mark W Miller
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Ohio Supreme Court, Ohio Supreme Court, Paul E. Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
