Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Scott v. Friedburg et al
as 1:2018cv00701
Plaintiff:
Shawn William Scott
Defendant:
Jacob Friedburg and Denver District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Denver District Court et al
as 1:2017cv00698
Petitioner:
Shawn William Scott
Respondent:
Denver District Court and Attorney General of State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeAtley v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
Alan DeAtley
Defendant:
State of Colorado, The, Attorney General, Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv01653
Petitioner:
Douglas Edward Bruce
Respondent:
State of Colorado, Colorado Probation Department, Colorado Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis Jr v. Armstead et al
as 1:2013cv02820
Plaintiff:
Robert E Lewis Jr
Defendant:
Romander Armstead, Amesa Armstead, Denver District Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maunz v. Denver District Court
as 1:2012cv00401
Petitioner:
William A. Maunz
Respondent:
Denver District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shepard v. City of Denver et al
as 1:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Shepard
Defendant:
City of Denver, Denver District Courts, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Doyle v. Egelhoff, et al
as 11-1427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. EGELHOFF, Judge, Courtroom II, Denver District Court, STATE PUBLIC DEFENDERS, i.e. Prosecutor's, The People State Public Defender's, J SUTHERS, Attorney General and others
Maunz v. Denver District Court, et al
as 11-1417
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. MAUNZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DENVER DISTRICT COURT and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
