Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Hinds v. Bishop et al
as 4:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hinds
Defendant:
CO Bishop, Chief of Security Clayton, Deputy Warden Somens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wonsch v. Garner et al
as 5:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Robert V Wonsch
Defendant:
Deputy Garner, Cleveland County Detention Center, F Dewayne Beggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinds v. Bishop et al
as 5:2016cv01489
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hinds
Defendant:
CO Bishop, Chief of Security Clayton, Deputy Warden Somens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Deputy Sheriff Cherry et al
as 4:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mark Aguirre
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Cherry and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finley v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2015cv00941
Plaintiff:
Devon Jay Finley
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Sheriff's Office, Oklahoma County Sheriff's Deputies, Agents Unidentified and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luginbyhl v. Glanz, et al
as 4:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Richard Weigel, S Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rickke L Green
Defendant:
Dan Reynolds, Robert Patton, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DiCesare v. McAnally et al
as 6:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Joseph DiCesare
Defendant:
Marilyn Kay McAnally , Delrain McAnally , B.K. McAnally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Niles et al
as 5:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
Cory Bryan Nelson
Defendant:
Jerry Niles, Detention Staff, Garfield County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Weaver et al
as 4:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Gaye Brewer
Defendant:
Deputy Weaver and Deputy Linham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
