Cases 21 - 30 of 164
Bergeron v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv06767
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Dianne Davis, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Georgia State Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Harvey v. Andrew Saul
as 1:2021cv06235
Plaintiff:
Dianne Harvey
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blankson v. ACMH Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04114
Plaintiff:
Kobe Adjei Blankson
Defendant:
ACMH Inc., Well Life Network, Human Resource Administration Public Assistance Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
Bernel v. Korobkova et al
as 1:2021cv05106
Defendant:
Nurse (John Doe), Nurse Practice (John Doe), William F. Keyser and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Bernel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brickel v. Saul
as 7:2020cv11033
Plaintiff:
Mary Dianne Brickel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Golding v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv06998
Plaintiff:
Karim Golding
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Giron v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv06995
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Giron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Muldrow v. Nissan 112 Sales Corp.
as 2:2020cv03748
Defendant:
Nissan 112 Sales Corp.
Plaintiff:
Dianne Muldrow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Muldrow v. Nissan 112 Sales Corp.
as 1:2020cv03748
Defendant:
Nissan 112 Sales Corp.
Plaintiff:
Dianne Muldrow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Kirschner v. Card et al
as 1:2020cv04346
Defendant:
FIAM LLC, JHVIT Strategic Equity Allocation Trust, SPDR S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Marc S Kirschner
Intervenor:
State Street Bank & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
