Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Bester v. Fondren
as 0:2008cv05403
Petitioner:
Gregory Bester
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bester v. Fondren et al
as 0:2008cv05325
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bester
Defendant:
Dwight L. Fondren, L. Ritter, J. Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitwright v. Fondren
as 4:2008cv00063
Petitioner:
Boyd Whitwright
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Falls v. Fondren
as 0:2008cv04803
Petitioner:
Lamont Gentry Falls
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Littlejohn v. Fondren
as 0:2008cv04757
Petitioner:
Darren Littlejohn
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ross v. Fondren
as 0:2008cv01325
Petitioner:
Nicholas John Ross
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Fondren et al
as 0:2008cv00509
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Johnson
Defendant:
Dwight L. Fondren, Westly Pummill, Joel Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Fondren
as 0:2008cv00405
Petitioner:
Shawn Simmons
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rudy Stanko, etc. v. Dwight Fondren, etc., et al
as 08-1300
Petitioner - Appellant:
Rudolph George Stanko, individually and on behalf of prisoners who were, are or will be imprisoned at the Sandstone Federal Prison
Respondent - Appellee:
Warden Dwight L. Fondren, Local Director, Michael K. Nalley, Regional Director and Harley Lappin, Central Director
Woodard v. Fondren
as 0:2008cv00194
Petitioner:
Glenn A Woodard
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
