Cases 21 - 30 of 43
McMillan-Hoyte v. Black et al
as 1:2015cv00934
Plaintiff:
Clathina McMillan-Hoyte
Defendant:
Trevor Black , Basil Saour , Alexandra Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dailey v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv01518
Plaintiff:
Diane B. Dailey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dailey v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00841
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Dailey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ponderosa Air, LLC v. Nassau Aircraft Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02105
Defendant:
Dr. William Dailey and Nassau Aircraft Holdings, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Nassau Aircraft Holdings, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Ponderosa Air, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ponderosa Air, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Othman v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04771
Defendant:
Sergeant Benjamin Benson, City of New York, Detective Sandra Dailey and others
Plaintiff:
Yaser Othman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05834
Plaintiff:
Ove Williams , Kadeem Wright , Marques Johnson and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Matthew Peacock and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2013cv05535
Plaintiff:
Andy Soto
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Saed Rabah, Andres Mahecha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dailey v. Graham
as 2:2012cv06034
Petitioner:
Dwayne Dailey
Respondent:
Harold D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabbagestalk v. Daytop Village, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02231
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
Daytop Village, Inc., Daytop Village Foundation, Inc. and Michael Dailey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burns v. Dailey et al
as 5:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Charles Burns
Defendant:
Stephen S. Dailey and Alaina Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
