Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Spellman v. Ohio Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2015cv01115
Plaintiff:
Lori Spellman
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Transportation, Robert Mock, Vikki Sharrock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00992
Plaintiff:
Donna Dailey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01954
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sue Dailey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01876
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ray Dailey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01105
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Dailey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Anne Dailey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $9,534.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2014cv00625
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$9,534.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Demario Dailey
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Goodwin et al v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2013cv02651
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Goodwin and Debora L Bodnar
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Michael Brelo, Cynthia Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 1:2013cv01756
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dailey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Dailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01755
Plaintiff:
Arthur E. Dailey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
