Cases 21 - 30 of 296
Donahue v. Gutman et al
as 3:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Donahue
Defendant:
Carl Gutman, Eric Mentis and Dan Kautz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oneail v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
Dan Oneail
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Grzyboloski et al
as 3:2022cv01876
Plaintiff:
Angelia D. Bell
Defendant:
Patrick Grzyboloski, Shedrick Williams, Gene Shurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crawford v. Dan The Baker LLC
as 2:2022cv03265
Plaintiff:
Mary Crawford
Defendant:
Dan The Baker LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Van Dan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03134
Plaintiff:
Sheila Van Dan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tsibouris v. Colerain Township et al
as 1:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Denise Y Tsibouris
Defendant:
Colerain Township, Mark C Denney, Matt Wahlert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopkins v. Schweitzer et al
as 1:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hopkins
Defendant:
Dan Schweitzer, Police Officer Carl Watts and Carl Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simms v. City of Nelsonville et al
as 2:2022cv02701
Plaintiff:
Dan Lee Simms, Sr
Defendant:
City of Nelsonville, becky Barber, Harry Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Casolari et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Cheri Casolari, Dan Lewis, Berenice Bernier and others
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
