Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2020cv02074
Respondent:
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Dan Schnurr, State of Oregon and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Tamar Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzales et al v. Riggs
as 3:2020cv01631
Plaintiff:
Jeana Gonzales, Committee to Recall Dan Holladay and Adam Marl
Defendant:
Kattie Riggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horizon Christian School et al v. State of Oregon
as 3:2020cv01345
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Horizon Christian School, Life Christian School, McMinnville Christian Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Warren et al
as 3:2020cv01086
Plaintiff:
Gerald Zachary Hammond
Defendant:
Dan Trifone and Derrick Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Dan-Bunkering (Middle East) DMCC v. M/V OLYMPIC PROGRESS, IMO No. 9513854
as 3:2020cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dan-Bunkering (Middle East) DMCC
Defendant:
M/V OLYMPIC PROGRESS, IMO No. 9513854
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gregory et al v. City of Beaverton et al
as 2:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Dan Frye, Justin Haugen, Greg Schapp and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gregory and Cindi Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory et al v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2020cv00337
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Dan Frye, Justin Haugen and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gregory and Cindi Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Boyd et al
as 3:2019cv02029
Defendant:
Oregon Humane Society, Ellen Rosenblum, Doug Mcinnis and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
