Cases 21 - 30 of 167
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Dan-Bunkering (Middle East) DMCC v. M/V OLYMPIC PROGRESS, IMO No. 9513854
as 3:2020cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dan-Bunkering (Middle East) DMCC
Defendant:
M/V OLYMPIC PROGRESS, IMO No. 9513854
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gregory et al v. City of Beaverton et al
as 2:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Dan Frye, Justin Haugen, Greg Schapp and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gregory and Cindi Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory et al v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2020cv00337
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Dan Frye, Justin Haugen and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gregory and Cindi Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Boyd et al
as 3:2019cv02029
Defendant:
Oregon Humane Society, Ellen Rosenblum, Doug Mcinnis and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01421
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
as 3:2019cv01022
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing LLC, Shapiro & Sutherland L.L.C., Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dan C Robinson, Nikki N Robinson, Nikki N. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Odom v. Russ
as 6:2019cv00832
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Odom
Defendant:
Dan Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlow v. Sickler Era et al
as 1:2019cv00188
Defendant:
John LaBell, Dan Penland, Sickler Era and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Talon Marlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Masonry Building Owners of Oregon et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2018cv02194
Defendant:
Mayor Ted Wheeler, Commissioner Dan Saltzman and City of Portland
Plaintiff:
Jim A. Atwood, Masonry Building Owners of Oregon and Fountain Village Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
