Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01532
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Gumm et al v. Molinaroli et al
as 2:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
Arlene D Gumm , Paul J Pontier , Cynthia Pontier and others
Defendant:
Alex A Molinaroli , Brian J Stief , Greg Guyett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Hughes v. United States Trustee's Office et al
as 2:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Danny Hughes
Defendant:
United States Trustee's Office , Paula Brunner and James Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hughes v. Miller et al
as 2:2016cv00541
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Hughes
Defendant:
Jame L Miller, Paula R Bronner and Miller & Miller Law LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeGraff, Amber et al v. Skatrud, Jeff et al
as 3:2015cv00690
Plaintiff:
Amber DeGraff and Michael DeGraff
Defendant:
Jeff S. Skatrud , Jacob R. Schoof , Diane K. Tertin and others
Cross_claimant:
Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation , Jacob R. Schoof , Diane K. Tertin and others
Cross_defendant:
Danny Douglas Mitchell, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01268
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Danny McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Anton v. Pollard
as 2:2014cv01562
Petitioner:
Danny F Anton
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TURNER v. USA
as 3:2014cv00838
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
DANNY TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adams, Danny v. Colvin, Carolyn
as 3:2014cv00740
Plaintiff:
Danny Adams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carvajal et al v. MYD Pegasus LLC
as 2:2013cv00200
Defendant:
MYD Pegasus LLC , Maria Goumenos and Danny Goumenos
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carvajal , Arturo Gonzales , Adalberto Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
