Cases 21 - 30 of 6,548
HENDERSON v. WETZEL, ET AL et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS HENDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ET AL, NANCY A. GIROUX, ET AL, MELINDA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC et al
as 2:2013mc00367
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC, ROSE MARKETING, LLC, DEPAOLA MARKETING, LLC and others
Receiver:
PETER S. DAVIS
STEWART v. AKRON GASKET & PACKING ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv60164
Plaintiff:
COREY STEWART
Defendant:
AKRON GASKET & PACKING ENTERPRISES, INC., AMTROL, INC., ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATRIUM COMPANIES, INC v. DARLING et al
as 2:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
ATRIUM COMPANIES, INC
Defendant:
CHRIS DARLING, DARLING SEO, LLC, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67788
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARBIN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67790
Plaintiff:
HUGH RAY HARBIN
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDANIEL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67787
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM McDANIEL
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67785
Plaintiff:
VENISE FAYE JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKWELL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67789
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ETHERDIGE v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67791
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY H. ETHERDIGE
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
