Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 63
ROBINSON v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv04667
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE ROBINSON
Defendant: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN INC., TEMPLE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv04349
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE ROBINSON
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM and CURRAN FRUMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2011cv03279
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PUGH et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60923
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE PUGH and CALLIE PUGH
Defendant: EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRINGTON v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62141
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE CARRINGTON
Defendant: AC&S, INC. , ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD , CAREY CANADA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2010cv05962
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
POPARDOWSKA v. ABRAMS
as 2:2010cv05617
Plaintiff: MARIA POPARDOWSKA
Defendant: DAVID LEE ABRAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPIKES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv04822
Petitioner: DAVID LEE SPIKES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BERKLEY et al v. SAMSON RESOURCES COMPANY
as 3:2010cv00223
Plaintiff: LEWIS W. BERKLEY , BARBARA M. BERKLEY , DOUGLAS E. DIEHL and others
Defendant: SAMSON RESOURCES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAUCH v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv02779
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE RAUCH, JR.
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?