Cases 21 - 30 of 7,868
Rodriguez v. Barber et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Barber and Randall Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning et al v. Harris County
as 4:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
Crystal Manning, Mariahlee Mansaw, Melissa Hollins and others
Defendant:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
James-Davis v. Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc
as 3:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Jolinda James-Davis
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc doing business as Walgreens Store #10193
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis Jr. v. Jose Chapa Law Firm
as 4:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Peter Davis Jr.
Defendant:
Jose Chapa Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. FCA US, LLC
as 5:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Glenisha Davis
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01325
Petitioner:
Lester Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Walmart Stores Texas LLC
as 4:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Kimberlee Davis
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Texas LLC, Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC, Walmart Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
