Cases 21 - 30 of 120
ZOSKY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
as 3:2014cv00795
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Zosky
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ZOSKY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
as 5:2014cv01395
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY ZOSKY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MCGRIFF v. STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2013cv07608
Plaintiff:
VALERYA MCGRIFF
Defendant:
STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Rafael Joseph v. Pennsylvania Department of Pub, et al
as 13-2757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAFAEL ANTONIO JOSEPH
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, BEEBAR, JONES and others
JOSEPH v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
as 2:2013cv01993
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ANTONIO JOSEPH
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCFARLAND v. MOLNAR et al
as 2:2013cv01587
Plaintiff:
ROBIN R. MCFARLAND
Defendant:
ROBERT S. MOLNAR, DENNIS BOOKWALTER and SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE (DPW)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ed Collins v. Daniel Boyd, et al
as 13-1739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ED COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL R. BOYD, KEVIN FRIEL, JAMES HART and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
