Cases 21 - 30 of 487
AMERSON v. OLIVER
as 5:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, UNIT MANAGER CHARLES HUDSON, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Andersen v. Bailey et al
as 1:2023cv04393
Plaintiff:
Kent Andersen
Defendant:
Derrick Bailey and Lorenzo Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
STYLES v. ODUM
as 7:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
DERRICK STYLES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canales et al v. Lail et al
as 1:2023cv04250
Plaintiff:
Luis Canales and Veronica Bruce
Defendant:
Derrick Lail, S.T.A.T., Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Styles v. Odum
as 4:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
Derrick Styles
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byron v. Held et al
as 4:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Derrick Byron
Defendant:
M Held and T Dargin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Nesbitt v. Mims
as 4:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Derrick Nesbitt
Respondent:
Charles Mims
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redding v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv02496
Plaintiff:
Derrick Redding
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
