Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Boyle v. Placer et al
as 2:2018at01044
Plaintiff:
Barbara Boyle
Defendant:
County Of Placer and Devon Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyle v. County of Placer et al
as 2:2018cv01690
Plaintiff:
Barbara Boyle
Defendant:
County of Placer and Devon Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hranac et al v. County of Placer et al
as 2:2017cv02697
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Hranac and Ronald Eugene Sandwell
Defendant:
County of Placer , Placer County Sheriff's Office , Devon Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hranac et al v. County of Placer et al
as 2:2017at01377
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Hranac and Ronald Eugene Sandwell
Defendant:
County of Placer, Placer County Sheriff's Office, Devon Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Freeman et al v. Placer County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2017cv02677
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Freeman and Terry Lee Stout
Defendant:
Placer County Sheriff Office, Placer County, Devon Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Humes v. Lukenbill et al
as 2:2017cv02609
Plaintiff:
Jon Humes
Defendant:
Lukenbill, Auburn Jail, Devon Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. CFMG et al
as 2:2017cv02319
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Polk
Defendant:
CFMG, Placer County and Devon Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kershner v. Placer County, California et al
as 2:2017cv02312
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Kershner
Defendant:
Placer County, California , Devon Bell and Megan Yaws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kershner v. Placer County et al
as 2:2017at01166
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Kershner
Defendant:
Placer County, Placer County Sheriff's Office, Devon Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Amatrone, et al v. Randy Champion, et al
as 17-17147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT AMATRONE, NICK AMATRONE and MARLA SHARLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY CHAMPION, DEVON BELL, DEVON BELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
