Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Diahann Grasty v. Colorado Technical University
as 13-3799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIAHANN GRASTY
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
Grasty v. Colorado Technical University
as 1:2013cv03221
Plaintiff:
Diahann Grasty
Defendant:
Colorado Technical University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRASTY v. COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
as 1:2013cv00476
Plaintiff:
DIAHANN GRASTY
Defendant:
COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grasty v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv02522
Plaintiff:
Diahann Grasty
Defendant:
Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc., City Of Chicago, Aetna Insurance Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRASTY v. CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, et al.,
as 1:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
DIAHANN GRASTY
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, CITY OF CHICAGO, AETNA INSURANCE GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grasty v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09141
Plaintiff:
Diahann Grasty
Defendant:
Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GRASTY v. ASTRUE
as 2:2008cv03416
Plaintiff:
DIAHANN GRASTY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GRASTY v. SOUTHEASTERN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2008cv00664
Plaintiff:
DIAHANN GRASTY
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRASTY V PTO
as 06-1556
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Diahann Grasty
Defendant-Appellee:
United States Patent and Trademark Office
GRASTY V PTO
as 06-1056
Defendant-Appellee:
CHARLES STEVEN BRANTLEY, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS, Jon W. Dudas, Director, Patent and Trademark Office and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DIAHANN GRASTY, DIAHANN GRASTY and DIAHANN GRASTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
