Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Thomas Moyler, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7653
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS MOYLER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Ivory Keyes v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7367
Petitioner / Appellant:
IVORY LAVAR KEYES
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Latron Brown v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7590
Petitioner / Appellant:
LATRON DUPREE BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Jason Overbey v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6899
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON MERRITT OVERBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Franklin Smith v. Kevin Dailey, et al
as 19-5363
Defendant / Appellee:
William Baggs, A.T.F., Barlow, Sergeant, Tulsa County Jail, Peter J. Mantoni, Officer of Virgnia Beach and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Franklin C. Smith
Deonta Hicks v. Wendell Pixley
as 19-7502
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections and WENDELL W. PIXLEY, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEONTA JEROME HICKS
Elmuiz Abdu v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6407
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELMUIZ ABDU
Brian Strebe v. Gene Johnson
as 18-6731
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN DAVID STREBE
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Antwan W. Callahan v. Harold W. Clarke
as 18-6262
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTWAN WYDELL CALLAHAN
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Christopher Bolling v. Harold Clarke
as 18-6164
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SHAWN BOLLING
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
