Cases 21 - 30 of 107
O'NEAL et al v. MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2018cv05269
Plaintiff:
GARY L. O'NEAL and GARY J. O'NEAL
Defendant:
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP , MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , RICHARD FULHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDONA v. SAM'S CLUB et al
as 1:2018cv03064
Plaintiff:
MINERVA CARDONA
Defendant:
SAM'S CLUB , SAM'S WEST, INC. , WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MANZONI v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv01738
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION , TARGET STORES , JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA MANZONI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STERLING v. ADVENTURE AQUARIUM, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00390
Defendant:
ADVENTURE AQUARIUM, LLC , HERSCHEND FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CORP., INC., SECURITAS SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON STERLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCMILLAN v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2017cv13435
Plaintiff:
LARRY MCMILLAN
Defendant:
C. RAY HUGHES, SGT. JOHN DOE #1, SCO JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERONVIL v. JANE DOE #1 et al
as 2:2017cv08055
Plaintiff:
LEO MERONVIL
Defendant:
JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDONA v. BLYTH SHIPHOLDING S.A. et al
as 1:2017cv00593
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN CARDONA
Defendant:
BLYTH SHIPHOLDING S.A., COOL CARRIERS AB, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KOMIS v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv05716
Plaintiff:
JASON KOMIS
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUSSELL v. FAMILY DOLLAR et al
as 1:2016cv04898
Plaintiff:
DAWN FUSSELL
Defendant:
FAMILY DOLLAR , JOHN DOES 1-3 and JOHN DOES 4-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOVIO v. O-LANO et al
as 1:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC BOVIO
Defendant:
EDWARD O-LANO, DONALD GANSKY, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
