Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Dorris v. Adams
as 1:2010cv01636
Petitioner:
Nathan Anthony Dorris
Respondent:
D. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dorris v. Adams
as 2:2010cv02482
Petitioner:
Nathan Anthony Dorris
Respondent:
D. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2010cv00630
Plaintiff:
Micheal Jonathon Daniels
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Andrea Chapman, Sam Spiegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2010at00323
Plaintiff:
Micheal Jonathon Daniels
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Andrea Chapman, Sam Spiegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorris S. Woods v. Southwest Airlines et al.
as 2:2009cv06416
Plaintiff:
Dorris S. Woods, Ph.D.
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines, Southwest Airlines and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dorris Demison v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00219
Plaintiff:
Dorris Demison
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dagny Dorris v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2007cv01462
Plaintiff:
Dagny Dorris
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
v. Dorris
as 2:2007at00968
Defendant:
Ashley Ann Dorris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. Chappell et al
as 2:2007at00512
Plaintiff:
Luellar Johnson, Alexandra Dorris and Luellar Johnson
Defendant:
Jonathan Chappell, State of California and Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
Jonathan Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Johnson et al v. Chappell et al
as 2:2007cv01126
Plaintiff:
Luellar Johnson, Alexandra Dorris, Jonathan Chappell and others
Defendant:
State of California and Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
