Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Dye v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03375
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Dye
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dye et al v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Sunny Dye , Michael Littrell , Sultan Mahmood and others
Defendant:
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. , PPP LP and Auto Company VII, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dye et al v. Porsche Cars North America Inc
as 3:2016cv01324
Plaintiff:
Sunny Dye , Michael Littrell , Cailin Ringelman and others
Defendant:
Porsche Cars North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murillo et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00955
Plaintiff:
Martha Murillo , Kathleen Bates , Jamie Anzaldua and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Dye et al
as 4:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Donald Butler
Defendant:
Steve Dye and Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Dye et al
as 3:2015cv02114
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Butler
Defendant:
Steve Dye and Officer Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00927
Plaintiff:
David Dye
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Travis v. City of Grand Prairie Texas et al
as 3:2014cv03650
Plaintiff:
Thomas Travis
Defendant:
City of Grand Prairie Texas, Rick Oseguera, Steven Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Stevens Transport Inc
as 3:2014cv01697
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dye
Defendant:
Stevens Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
