Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Martinez et al v. Mullen et al
as 3:2011cv01787
Plaintiff:
Lisa Martinez and Sensational Smiles, LLC
Defendant:
Jewel Mullen , Jeanne P. Strathearn , Lance E. Banwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowacki v. Malloy et al
as 3:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Andrew McDonald, Michael Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Westport Board of Education et al
as 3:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Westport Board of Education , Peter Eramo , Elliot Landon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elliot v. Pratt & Whitney
as 3:1999cv01290
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Elliot
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Div. Of United Tech Corp.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Van Law v. Proficio Mortgage Ventures LLC et al
as 3:2009cv01183
Plaintiff:
James Van Law
Defendant:
Proficio Mortgage Ventures LLC, Proficio Bank, Ellie Mae Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Morley v. Bridgeport Hosp et al
as 3:2007cv01406
Plaintiff:
Eugene Elliot Morley
Defendant:
Bridgeport Hospital, Physician and Perdue Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Morley v. Bridgeport Hosp et al
as 3:2007mc00256
Plaintiff:
Eugene Elliot Morley
Defendant:
Bridgeport Hospital, Physician and Perdue Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Karlen et al v. Westport et al
as 3:2007cv00309
Plaintiff:
Carla Karlen and Carla Karlen
Defendant:
Town of Westport, Town of Westport, Elliot Landon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Letter Rogatory v. Wightman
as 3:2001mc00308
In Re:
Letter Rogatory
Defendant:
Elliot C. Wightman
Not Yet Classified:
James G. Binch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
