Cases 21 - 30 of 90
H.R. et al v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
H. R. , J. A. , J. R. B. and others
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Corizon, Inc., Mark Elliot Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Chand v. Bravo
as 13-2099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAREND CHAND
Defendant - Appellee:
ERASMO BRAVO, Warden and STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Wright v. Bravo
as 1:2013cv00429
Plaintiff:
Shavis D Wright
Defendant:
Erasmo Bravo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RJ et al v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00265
Plaintiff:
RJ , RR , BR and others
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc. , Corizon, Inc. , Mark Elliot Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
FM et al v. Walden et al
as 1:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
FM , SJ , AM and others
Defendant:
Mark Walden , John/Jane Doe, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ruppert v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Ruppert
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Corrections, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility, Gregg Marcantel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Chand
as 12-2197
Petitioner:
In re: NARENDRA CHAND
Respondent:
ERASMO BRAVO, Warden, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility and STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Brown v. Bravo, et al
as 12-2187
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
ERASMO BRAVO, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Chand v. Bravo et al
as 1:2012cv01044
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and State of New Mexico
Petitioner:
Narend Chand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Napeahi v. Bravo et al
as 1:2012cv01042
Plaintiff:
William Napeahi
Defendant:
Erasmo Bravo, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility and Silver Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
