Cases 21 - 30 of 48
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv00309
Petitioner:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EDMOND v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00350
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDMOND
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
EDMONDS v. BERRYHILL
as 4:2017cv00181
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
NANCY A. EDMONDS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only), SSA-USAO (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TROUTMAN v. EDMONDS et al
as 2:2017cv00376
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, F. BUSBY, S. EDMONDS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TROUTMAN
Mediator:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonds v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00485
Petitioner:
Johnny Edmonds
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDMOND v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER GRP.
as 1:2016cv01823
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY EDMOND
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER GRP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
EDMONDS v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2016cv01817
Petitioner:
JOHNNY EDMONDS
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EDMOND v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01029
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EDMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Kervin v. Superintendent et al
as 3:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Shane Kervin
Defendant:
Clair Barnes, April Valdez, SGT Gapski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
