Cases 21 - 30 of 46
FLOREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35666
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE R FLOREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52050
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLOREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOREZ JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46942
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HERMAN FLOREZ JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRONG v. DYKES et al
as 3:2019cv04814
Defendant:
DICE, KELLY, EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florez v. BCC Hospitality Services LLC
as 1:2018cv24740
Plaintiff:
Ivan Florez
Defendant:
BCC Hospitality Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Florez v. Echarte
as 1:2016cv23136
Plaintiff:
Myriam Florez
Defendant:
Pedro Echarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Florez v. United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Group et al
as 9:2013cv81179
Plaintiff:
Fedra Moreno Florez
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Group and Palm Beach Aggregates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosario v. 12425, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv23429
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rosario
Defendant:
12425, Inc. , Laura Insua , Manuel Insua and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Abrams v. Florez et al
as 0:2013cv61313
Plaintiff:
Catena Abrams
Defendant:
Eduardo Florez and Vision Community Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Rosario et al v. ATI Enterprises of Florida, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv20832
Plaintiff:
Maria Rosario , Sajeev Bhaskaran , Rajan Daniel and others
Defendant:
ATI Enterprises of Florida, Inc., ATI Enterprises, Inc. and American Trades Institute of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
