Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Mager v. Electro Scientific, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02132
Defendant:
Frederick A. Ball, Electro Scientific, Inc., Richard H. Wills and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Mager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Klein v. Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02099
Defendant:
Frederick A. Ball, Raymond A. Link, Richard H. Wills and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Morris v. Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02064
Defendant:
Frederick A. Ball, Richard H. Wills, Raymond A. Link and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Morris
Reynolds v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv01911
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. United States et al
as 3:2018cv00823
Defendant:
Richard Ives and United States
Plaintiff:
Frederick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
City of Portland, Oregon v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00817
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Portland, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00674
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis plc and others
Plaintiff:
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 6:2018cv00535
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis plc and others
Plaintiff:
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
