Cases 21 - 29 of 29
PEARSON et al v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF
as 4:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRYANT, JAMES DUFFY, DARION DASHON HARRIS and others
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUELOVE v. COMMANDER
as 4:2016cv00168
Respondent:
COMMANDER and FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
DOMINIC TRUELOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIRANDA-SANCHAEZ v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2016cv00238
Defendant:
DEPUTIES, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, KEITH ANDREW HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MIRANDA-SANCHAEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LOOP et al
as 4:2016cv00071
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION and FRANK LOOP
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUKES v. FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 4:2016cv00051
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF FLOYD
Plaintiff:
ISAAC JACIEL LUKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSH v. SANDS et al
as 4:2016cv00035
Defendant:
ELLENBRAND, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, FURR and others
Plaintiff:
QUAONTUS L. RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APPLEGATE v. MILLS et al
as 4:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. APPLEGATE
Defendant:
ARCHIBALD, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, HANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOZIER v. LOOP
as 4:2015cv00032
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, FRANK LOOP and DARRYL MILLS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CODY LOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. MORRIS et al
as 4:2014cv00102
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, D. MORRIS and R. VEST
Plaintiff:
DONALD BRUCE ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
