Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Xavier v. Norcross et al
as 3:2012cv00202
Plaintiff:
Francis Paul Xavier
Defendant:
David Norcross, Reeg and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xavier v. Turner et al
as 3:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Francis P. Xavier
Defendant:
Ardyce Turner, Office of Children's Services and Department of Health and Social Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Xavier v. Turnbull
as 3:2012cv00194
Petitioner:
Francis P. Xavier
Respondent:
Craig Turnbull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estonilo et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:1991cv00269
Plaintiff:
Theodore E. Estonilo, Francis R. Estonilo and Matthew Kim Estonilo
Defendant:
United States of America and Alaska Native Service Hospital
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Drews v. Municipality of Anchorage et al
as 3:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jaimie Lynne Drews
Defendant:
Municipality of Anchorage, Brother Francis Shelter, Providence Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Xavier et al v. Lopez-Coonjohn et al
as 3:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Francis P. Xavier, P.X. and A.X.
Defendant:
Heidi Lopez-Coonjohn, North Star Behavioral Health System and Lauri Owen
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hunter et al v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dolores Hunter and Estate of Benjamin G. Francis
Defendant:
Philip Morris USA, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wood et al v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Daisy Wood, Daisy Wood, Lester K. Syren and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
