Cases 21 - 30 of 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McLaughlin v. USA
as 5:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
James Franklin McLaughlin, III
Defendant:
Brett Stevens and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Simms v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 4:2022cv00318
Petitioner:
Franklin S Simms
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bridges v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
Kevin Gates, White Boy, Billy Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Laffoon v. Bridges et al
as 5:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Laffoon
Defendant:
Carrie Bridges, Kevin Stitt and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. Riley
as 5:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Tory Taylor and Sommer Franklin
Defendant:
Bobby Don Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Buckner v. Sallisaw, City of et al
as 6:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
William Sean Buckner
Defendant:
Sallisaw, City of, Houston Murray and Terry Franklin
Interested Party:
CSS DHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Knight v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knight
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, John Scully, Brent Sugg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
