Cases 21 - 30 of 354
McDonald v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
as 6:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
James McDonald
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hoagland v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
as 6:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Trevor Hoagland
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burns v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
as 6:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burns
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mathis v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
as 6:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mathis
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Byerly v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
as 6:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Bryan Byerly
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Brown v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10085
Plaintiff:
Demarko Brown
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, Marriott International Inc., Renaissance Center Management Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDowell v. City of St. Petersburg et al
as 8:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Rondale McDowell
Defendant:
City of St. Petersburg, ABM Security Services, G4S Secure Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berryman v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Zachary Berryman
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc. and Securitas Critical Infrastructure Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Patton v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
as 6:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Jack Patton
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
