Cases 21 - 30 of 185
MARTIN v. CUPP et al
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CUPP, BLAYZE RODGERS, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWEATT v. CARTER et al
as 2:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SWEATT
Defendant:
ROBERT ERIC CARTER, JR., DEREK CHRISTAIN, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNEIL v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
MICKEL J. MCNEIL
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, HYATT, YARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISON v. W.V.C.F. et al
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
DAVID ISON
Defendant:
W.V.C.F., I.D.O.C., PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARISH v. BROWN et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PARISH
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, JERRY SNYTER, BEVERLY GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS MOORE
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, J. SNYDER, K. HUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO C. GRIFFITH
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, HEATHER MILLS, BRENDA HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILMORE v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
MICHAEL L. GILMORE, JR.
Respondent:
RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SNOW v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SNOW
Defendant:
MATTHEW BROWN, DANIEL BEDWELL, KEVIN GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOW v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SNOW
Defendant:
MATTHEW BROWN, KEVIN GILMORE, RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
