Cases 21 - 30 of 133
Gilmore v. Hembrook et al
as 6:2022cv06379
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gilmore
Defendant:
Brian Hembrook and D. Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Rensselaer County Medical Examiner et al
as 1:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gilmore
Defendant:
Rensselaer County Medical Examiner, Dr. Dennis Chutte and Matthew Hoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Gilmor v. Aero Snow Removal LLC
as 2:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Scott Gilmor
Defendant:
Aero Snow Removal LLC doing business as Aero Snow Removal Temp Personnel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Parks et al v. Murray et al
as 6:2022cv06020
Plaintiff:
Lavon D. Parks, Ronnie Lambert, Walter S. Duprey and others
Defendant:
CO Murray, CO Timothy Gilmore, CO Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Gilmore v. Commisioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv01184
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jones Gilmore
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Parthenakis v. RMR Mortgage Trust et al
as 1:2021cv05694
Defendant:
Matt Jordan, Jeffrey Somers, John Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Parthenakis
Gilmore v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00526
Plaintiff:
Jerome Gilmore, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Meyers v. Special Needs X-Press, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02600
Defendant:
Special Needs X-Press, Inc., Ms. A. Miller, Martin Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
