Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Green et al v. Morris et al
as 8:2022cv02768
Plaintiff:
Anabel Green and Kevin Green
Defendant:
Brandon Morris and Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. McCarthy et al
as 8:2022cv01799
Plaintiff:
Shannon B. Wright
Defendant:
Ashley K. McCarthy, Jeffrey Shama and Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shroyer v. Judd
as 8:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
William L. Shroyer
Defendant:
Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shroyer v. Judd
as 8:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
William L. Shroyer
Defendant:
Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Dimmig et al
as 8:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Grace Bowles, Brian W. Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Sgt. Crandall, Sgt. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Polk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Marcus White
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Office, Haines City Police Department, Jason Rafael Roldos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Keith McKelsie Brown
Defendant:
Grady Judd, William Galloway, J. Gordon Rudolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stowe v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Stowe
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Polk County, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
