Cases 21 - 30 of 56
United Water & Sanitation District v. Geo-Con, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03241
Defendant:
Geo-Con, Inc., Geo-Con Solutions, Inc. and Geo-Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United Water & Sanitation District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mims v. Buffington et al
as 1:2018cv01311
Plaintiff:
Keandre Mims
Defendant:
Buffington and GEO Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mejia v. U.S. Marshals Service et al.
as 1:2018cv00313
Petitioner:
Frances Antonia Amador Mejia
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Geo Aurora Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Derrera v. GEO/Greeley Day Reporting Center et al
as 1:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Senobio Derrera
Defendant:
GEO/Greeley Day Reporting Center and Stephanie Southard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. GEO Correctional and Detention
as 1:2017cv02442
Petitioner:
Steve Kedrick Walker
Respondent:
GEO Correctional and Detention
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hopkins v. Ramisch et al
as 1:2017cv02242
Plaintiff:
Austin Hopkins
Defendant:
Rick Ramisch, Hartly, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haines v. GEO Group, Inc., The et al
as 1:2017cv01086
Plaintiff:
Christopher Haines
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., The, Aurora Detention Center, Jeffery Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. GEO Group, Inc., The
as 1:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Medina
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEO Group, Inc, The et al v. Swando et al
as 1:2016cv02315
Plaintiff:
GEO Group, Inc, The and BI Incorporated
Defendant:
Matthew J Swando and Numerex Corp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831
GEO Group, Inc., The v. United Government Security Officers of America International Union
as 1:2016cv02288
Plaintiff:
GEO Group, Inc, The
Defendant:
United Government Security Officers of America International Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
