Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Sharkany v. McKinlay et al
as 3:2016cv01601
Plaintiff:
Glen Alan Sharkany
Defendant:
Thomas Ward McKinlay and James Gusfa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruscher et al v. Omnicare Inc. et al
as 3:2015mc00024
Plaintiff:
Susan Ruscher and Doe States
Defendant:
Omnicare Inc., Omnicare Pharmacy of Texas 2, LP, Omnicare Pharmacy of Florida, LP and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
Kurrus v. Gause et al
as 3:2013cv01439
Petitioner:
Arthur Glen Kurrus
Respondent:
Kevin Gause and Commissoner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Huston v. Cossette et al
as 3:2013cv00623
Plaintiff:
Donald Huston
Defendant:
Jeffry Cossette , Timothy Topulos , Mark Walerysiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Cossette et al
as 3:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Brian Sullivan
Defendant:
Jeffry Cossette , Timothy Topulos , Mark Walerysiak and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Donald Huston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryans v. Cossette et al
as 3:2011cv01263
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Bryans
Defendant:
Evan Cossette , Jeffry Cossette , Timothy Topulos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vetromile v. JPI Partners, LLC
as 3:2011mc00141
Plaintiff:
Glen Vetromile
Defendant:
JPI Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Temich v. Cossette et al
as 3:2011cv00958
Plaintiff:
Pedro Temich
Defendant:
Evan Cossette , Jeffry W. Cossette , Timothy Topulos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Methvin v. Cossette et al
as 3:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Methvin
Defendant:
Evan Cossette , Jeffrey W. Cossette , Timothy Topulos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Costello et al v. Home Depot, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00953
Plaintiff:
James D. Costello , Liza Logan , Matthew Picco and others
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
