Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Gonzales v. Bodenstab et al
as 2:2011cv02431
Plaintiff:
John Gonzales
Defendant:
James Bodenstab, Swanson Corp., Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Anderson County Detention Facility
as 3:2009cv00556
Plaintiff:
Tarik Tate
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Facility, Tom Marshall, A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv02327
Plaintiff:
Daryl Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Merino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv02242
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Merino
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI-Memphis, United States Department Of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNutt v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv02873
Plaintiff:
Jesse R. McNutt
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons, Bruce Pearson, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rojas v. Pearson et al
as 2:2008cv02789
Plaintiff:
Roman Rojas
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Deborah Gonzales, Dorothy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. Barrow et al
as 2:2008cv02277
Petitioner:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
John Barrow, Max Burn, Adam Toledano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Todd v. Federal Correctional Center Memphis et al
as 2:2008cv02224
Plaintiff:
Xavier S. Todd
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Center Memphis, Jaun Castillo, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Judicial Review of Denial of Naturalization Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
