Cases 21 - 30 of 32,568
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gonzalez, et al v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
NANCY GONZALEZ and MARK A. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
Allied Trust Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Arenas et al v. Franklin Park LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03545
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Vazquez Arenas, Rafael Baez Ortigoza and Manuel Eugenio Gonzalez
Defendant:
Franklin Park LLC, Matthew Roff, Anatoly Dubinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Saldivar v. Helander
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Elsa Guadalupe Saldivar Individually And A/N/F For Mia Gonzalez, A Minor
Defendant:
Charles Helander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Garza v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Irma Gonzalez Garza
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-3091
Petitioner:
ONECIMO SOTELO GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chaarawi v. Gonzalez, et al.
as 24-3073
Defendant:
SHARMIR GONZALEZ, Shamir Gonzalez, MARCUS ENSIEDJIAN and others
Plaintiff:
WALID M. CHAARAWI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
