Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
James R Andrews and Grace B Andrews
Defendant:
3M Company , AW Chesterton Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woody v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, The
as 3:2009cv02029
Plaintiff:
Danny P Woody, Danny P Woody and Danny P Woody
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Inter Travel & Services Inc et al v. Columbia Metropolitan Airport et al
as 3:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
Inter Travel & Services Inc, Inter Travel & Services Inc, Global Exec Aviation Inc and others
Defendant:
Columbia Metropolitan Airport, Columbia Metropolitan Airport, Columbia Metropolitan Airport and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv03149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vawter et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al
as 3:2008cv02426
Plaintiff:
John W Vawter, John W Vawter, Ernestine Vawter and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc, Anchor Darling Valve Company, Armstrong International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Albertson et al v. Bayer Cropscience Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00337
Plaintiff:
Harold L Albertson and Gertrude E Albertson
Defendant:
National Service Industries Inc, National Service Industries Inc, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Duncan et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al
as 0:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Milton Duncan, Milton Duncan, Milton Duncan and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Aqua-Chem Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
IMO Industries Inc
Cross Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Aurora Pump Company, Buffalo Pumps Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
