Cases 21 - 30 of 1,278
Charles, Gordon v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv20284
Plaintiff:
Gordon Charles
Defendant:
Brian Adams, City of Miami, Miami Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Oppenheimer v. AtkinsRealis USA Inc.
as 8:2024cv00203
Defendant:
AtkinsRealis USA Inc. and Atkins North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Hamel v. Austin
as 6:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Gordon R. Hamel
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Next Insurance US Company v. Apogee Integrations, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Next Insurance US Company
Defendant:
Apogee Integrations, LLC, Nicholas Gordon, John Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Charles v. Warden, Orange County Jail
as 6:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Gordon Carnold Charles, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv02332
Plaintiff:
Gordon Bruder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sizemore et al v. Ronaldo
as 1:2023cv24481
Plaintiff:
Michael Sizemore, Mikey Vongdara and Gordon Lewis
Defendant:
Cristiano Ronaldo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
DIAZ v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE DIAZ
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and ANGELA GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Gualtieri
as 8:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
Lequez Gordon
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
