Cases 21 - 30 of 273
Jeffrey Henry v. Grady Perry
as 22-5777
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY L. HENRY
Respondent / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden
Zachary Pence v. Grady Perry
as 22-5727
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZACHARY J. PENCE and ZACHARY JAMES PENCE
Respondent / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY and GRADY PERRY, Warden
Raymond Watison v. Core Civic Solutions, et al
as 22-5804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND WATISON
Defendant:
CORE CIVIC SOLUTIONS
Defendant / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden, DARYL CREWS, Chief of Security, LARRY COLEMAN, Assistant Chief of Security and others
Fredrick TuckerIn re: Fredrick Tucker
as 22-5785
Petitioner:
In re: FREDRICK LEON TUCKER
Respondent:
GRADY PERRY, Warden
Antonio Sweatt v. Damon Hininger, et al
as 22-5635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO L. SWEATT
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON T. HININGER, in his individual and official capacities as CEO of CoreCivic, GRADY PERRY, Warden, in his individual and official capacities, CHIEF OF SECURITY PATTON, in his individual and official capacities at SCCF and others
Delk v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2022cv02540
Plaintiff:
Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Columbus Malone, Warden Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Delk v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2022cv02539
Plaintiff:
Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
CoreCivic, danita woods, Warden Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adams v. Perry
as 1:2022cv01100
Petitioner:
Montez Adams
Defendant:
Warden Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guevara v. Perry
as 3:2022cv00237
Petitioner:
Lizandro Guevara
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Nance v. Grady Perry
as 22-5284
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH NATHANIEL NANCE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GRADY PERRY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
