Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv03514
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Hardy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405
Scott et al v. Hardy et al
as 4:2020cv02649
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Express Corporation doing business as RMX Global Logistics, Ten Fold Transportation, Inc, Shelton Hardy, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Scott, Sr, Louis Scott, Jr and Deborah Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cornell v. Hardy et al
as 4:2020cv01824
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Express Corporation, Ten Fold Transportation, Inc, Shelton Hardy, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Everett Cornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2020cv01791
Plaintiff:
Deandria Hardy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chappell v. United States Government et al
as 9:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Modier, CSO Mr. Moore, CSO A. Coles and others
Plaintiff:
William Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Antonelli
as 8:2018cv00137
Petitioner:
Phillip Hardy
Respondent:
Warden Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv02663
Plaintiff:
James Hardy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hardy v. Stirling
as 5:2017cv00306
Petitioner:
Kevin T Hardy
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
Hugh D Hardy, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
