Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Price v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2012cv03227
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Price
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Kansas State Atty General, Dickinson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hawkins v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2012cv02553
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Hawkins
Defendant:
David A. Hopkins , Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas , Paul Simonich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hawkins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2010cv02629
Plaintiff:
Clarice C. Hawkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hawkins v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2010cv03080
Petitioner:
Harry Hawkins, Jr
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, Issac Fullwood , Jr., Cranston Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hawkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2009cv03261
Petitioner:
Harold E. Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, Sam Cline and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2009cv03226
Petitioner:
Harry Hawkins, Jr
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Sheldon Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009mc00424
Hawkins v. Lemons et al
as 5:2009cv03116
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Lemons, Fongvilay Phommachanh, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Brooks
as 2:2008cv02338
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
Raymond Brooks
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tews et al v. Renzenberger, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02064
Plaintiff:
Gary Tews, Gary Tews, Gary Tews and others
Defendant:
Renzenberger, Inc., Renzenberger, Inc. and Renzenberger, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
