Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Barnett v. Northwest Missouri Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2015cv06119
Plaintiff:
Brandon Barnett
Defendant:
Northwest Missouri Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center, Hinton, Parsa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leader v. NMPRC Staff et al
as 5:2015cv06084
Plaintiff:
Charles Leader
Defendant:
NMPRC Staff, Parsa and Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02075
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Pryor , Nancy Mackinnon , James Leathers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harding et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01648
Plaintiff:
Nicky Harding , Nancy Mackinnon , Pius Nwinee and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hinton v. Larkins
as 6:2014cv03327
Petitioner:
Christy Marie Hinton
Respondent:
Steve Larkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilmer v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00140
Petitioner:
Hinton Gilmer, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hinton v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv01477
Plaintiff:
Daniesha C. Hinton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Hinton v. Norman
as 4:2012cv01189
Petitioner:
Raymond Hinton
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. State of Missouri et al
as 5:2012cv06061
Plaintiff:
Jamie Jones
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Donald Hinton and Karl Sontheimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Norman
as 4:2012cv00760
Petitioner:
Raymond Hinton
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
