Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Calvillo et al v. Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. et al
as 4:2011cv04033
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Calvillo , Nathan Calvillo , Joleen F. Delutri and others
Defendant:
Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. , Siouxland Urology Center, L.L.C. , John A. Wolpert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Howard Venture LLC v. Lively et al
as 4:2010cv04072
Plaintiff:
Howard Venture LLC
Defendant:
Scott D. Lively and Lively Foods LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Killeaney v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv03013
Petitioner:
Howard Douglas Killeaney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Howard Venture LLC v. Lively et al
as 4:2010cv04172
Plaintiff:
Howard Venture LLC
Defendant:
Scott D. Lively and Lively Foods LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard Venture LLC v. Lively et al
as 4:2010cv04072
Plaintiff:
Howard Venture LLC
Defendant:
Scott D. Lively and Lively Foods LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Killeaney v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv03009
Petitioner:
Howard D. Killeaney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Case name not on file
as 3:2009cv03016
Petitioner:
Howard Douglas Killeaney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Wipt, Inc. et al
as 4:2009mc00071
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
Wipt, Inc., Dog, Inc. and Lois Lex
Kinney et al v. Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. et al
as 4:2009cv04051
Plaintiff:
Theresa Kinney, Theresa Kinney, Theresa Kinney and others
Defendant:
Siouxland Urology Associates P.C., John A. Wolpert, David D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
