Cases 21 - 30 of 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Techota LLC v. CP Home Care Vance LLC et al
as 7:2018cv00317
Plaintiff:
Techota LLC
Defendant:
CP Home Care Vance LLC , Pacrim US (AL) LLC , Pacrim U.S. LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
Phyllis J. Robertson, Shannon Hendon, Jeff Bauer and others
Counter_claimant:
CP Home Care Vance LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blackmon v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr
Defendant:
Mick Hale, Brandon Kent Falls, A C Roper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackey v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv01657
Plaintiff:
Bakari Mackey
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Unknown African-American Female Seargeant, Mike Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Jimmie Hale Mission
as 2:2017cv01140
Plaintiff:
James L Dillon
Defendant:
Jimmie Hale Mission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv00625
Plaintiff:
Todd Alexander
Defendant:
Michael Hale and James Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeller v. Thomas et al
as 4:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Anthony Zeller
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brabham v. Jefferson County Alabama et al
as 2:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Beverly Brabham
Defendant:
Jefferson County Alabama, Mike Hale and Forestdale Deputy Sheriff Station
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairfield Community Clean Up Crew Inc v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
Fairfield Community Clean Up Crew Inc
Defendant:
Mike Hale and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. Graffeo et al
as 2:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Hayden
Defendant:
Michael G Graffeo , Mike Hale , Raymond Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
