Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Seattle Powersports LLC v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01339
Plaintiff:
Seattle Powersports LLC dba Lawless Harley-Davidson of Renton and Seattle Powersports LLC
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services Inc., Harley-Davidson Motor Company Inc., Harley-Davidson Financial Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crauder v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 8:2019cv01801
Plaintiff:
Gregory Crauder
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Carroll v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 8:2019cv01750
Plaintiff:
Robert Carroll
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lavecchia v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 0:2019cv61186
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura Lavecchia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Anker v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00904
Plaintiff:
Alex Anker
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Graves v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 6:2017cv01856
Plaintiff:
Kim Graves
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Graves v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kim Graves
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
