Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Campbell et al v. Hollis Independent School District NO 66 of Harmon County Oklahoma et al
as 5:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Campbell
Defendant:
Hollis Independent School District No 66 of Harmon County Oklahoma, Hollis Public School Board of Education, Jennifer McQueen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mid-South Iron Workers Welfare Plan et al v. Harmon et al
as 5:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Mid-South Iron Workers Welfare Plan , Iron Workers Mid South Pension Fund The , Oklahoma Iron Workers Direct Contribution Plan and Trust and others
Defendant:
Ryan Michael Harmon and Krystal Dawn Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Glover v. Vest et al
as 5:2014cv00936
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Ann Glover
Defendant:
Jayson Vest, David Leathers , Hollis City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner et al v. Gross et al
as 5:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
Charles F Warner , James A Coddington , Benjamin R Cole and others
Defendant:
Kevin J Gross , Michael W Roach , Steve Burrage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Entech Sales and Service Inc v. Harmons Electric Inc
as 5:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Entech Sales and Service Inc
Defendant:
Harmons Electric Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mack Maurice Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harmon v. Trammell
as 5:2013cv00080
Petitioner:
Marlon Deon Harmon
Respondent:
Anita Trammell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foraker v. Reeves et al
as 4:2011cv00759
Plaintiff:
Eric Foraker
Defendant:
Benjamin Lee Reeves , Harmon Transport, Inc. , Trailiner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
