Cases 21 - 30 of 135
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ali S. Hashemi v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00974
Plaintiff:
Ali S. Hashemi
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HASHEMI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25134
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAHRZAD HASHEMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ken Hashemi et al v. Bosley, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
Steve Altes, Ken Hashemi, Rafael Artime and others
Defendant:
Bosley, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Jude Milson and Peter Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Terry v. Hashemi et al
as 2:2020cv01148
Defendant:
C. Cryer, M. Carrasquillo and Nastran Hashemi
Plaintiff:
Bruce Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW VAN AUKEN, PATRICIA D. CASAZZA, LORIE VAN AUKEN and others
Defendant:
National Iranian Gas Company, Iran Airlines, National Iranian Oil Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
